Your investment computer — here’s why should you write and design by hand

Your investment computer — here’s why should you write and design by hand

J.K. Rowling scribbled down the first 40 names of characters that will can be found in Harry Potter in a paper notebook. J.J. Abrams writes his drafts that are first a paper notebook. Upon his go back to Apple in 1997, Steve Jobs first cut through the complexity that is existing drawing a simple chart on whiteboard. Of course, they’re not the only ones…

Here’s the notebook that belongs to Pentagram partner Michael Bierut. A lot of the pages inside the notebook resemble the proper side, that he had lost a really precious notebook, which contained “a drawing my then 13-year-old daughter Liz did that she claims may be the original sketch when it comes to Citibank logo. although he’s got thought to Design Observer”

Author Neil Gaiman’s notebook, who writes his books — including American Gods, The Graveyard Book, as well as the final two thirds of Coraline — by hand.

And a notebook from information designer Nicholas Felton, who recorded and visualized ten years of his life in data, and developed the Reporter app.

There’s a reason why people, that have the option to actually use a computer, choose to make writing by hand a part of their creative process. And it also all starts with a significant difference that people may easily overlook — writing by hand is very different than typing.

Written down Down the Bones, author Natalie Goldberg advises that writing is a physical activity, and therefore afflicted with the equipment you employ. Typing and writing by hand produce very different writing. She writes, I am writing something emotional, I must write it the first time directly with hand on paper“ I have found that when. Handwriting is more connected to your movement regarding the heart. Yet, whenever I tell stories, I go directly to the typewriter.”

Goldberg’s observation might have a small sample size of one, but it’s an incisive observation. More importantly, studies in the field of psychology support this conclusion.

Similarly, authors Pam A. Mueller and Daniel M. Oppenheimer students notes that are making either by laptop or by hand, and explored how it affected their memory recall. In their study published in Psychological Science, they write, “…even when permitted to review notes after a week’s delay, participants that has taken notes with laptops performed worse on tests of both factual content and conceptual understanding, relative to participants that has taken notes longhand.”

All have felt the difference in typing and writing by hand while psychologists figure out what actually happens in the brain, artists, designers, and writers. Many who originally eagerly adopted the computer when it comes to promises of efficiency, limitlessness, and connectivity, have returned back once again to writing by hand.

There are a variety of hypotheses that you can get on why writing by hand produces different results than typing, but here’s a one that is prominent emerges from the realm of practitioners:

You better understand your work

“Drawing is an easy method for me to articulate things inside myself that I can’t otherwise grasp,” writes artist Robert Crumb in the book with Peter Poplaski. This means, Crumb draws never to express something already he understand, but already to create sense of something he doesn’t.

This brings to mind a quote often attributed to Cecil Lewis, “ We do not write to be understood; we write in order to understand. day” Or as author Jennifer Egan says towards the Guardian, “The writing reveals the story in my experience.”

This sort of thinking — one that’s done not just using the mind, but also aided by the hands — can be used to any or all types of fields. For example, in Sherry Turkle’s “Life on the Screen,” she quotes a faculty person in MIT as saying:

“Students can look at the screen and work in their head as clearly as they would if they knew it in other ways, through traditional drawing for example… at it for a while without learning the topography of a site, without really getting it. Once you draw a niche site, when you put into the contour lines as well as the trees, it becomes ingrained in your thoughts. You started to understand the site in a way that isn’t possible with the computer.”

The quote continues when you look at the notes, “That’s the manner in which you get acquainted with a terrain — by retracing and tracing it, not by letting the computer ‘regenerate’ it for you personally.”

“You start by sketching, then chances are you do a drawing, then you make a model, and then you head to reality — you are going to the site — and then you go back to drawing,” says architect Renzo Piano in Why Architects Draw. “You build up a kind of circularity between drawing and making and then back again.”

In the book, Orbiting the Giant Hairball, author Gordon MacKenzie likened the creative process to 1 of a cow milk that is making. We could see a cow milk that is making it is hooked up into the milking machine, and we realize that cows eat grass. But the part that is actual the milk will be created remains invisible.

There is certainly an invisible part to making something new, the processes of which are obscured from physical sight by scale, certainly. But, elements of everything we can see and feel, is felt through writing by hand.

Steve Jobs said in a job interview with Wired Magazine, “Creativity is just connecting things. Once you ask creative people how they did something, they feel only a little guilty because they didn’t really do so, they simply saw something. It seemed obvious to them after a few years. That’s because they could actually connect experiences they’ve had and synthesize things that are new. Plus the good reason these people were in a position to do that has been that they’ve had more experiences or they usually have thought more about their experiences than other people.”

Viewed from Jobs’s lens, perhaps writing by hand enables individuals to do the latter — think and understand more info on their own experiences. Similar to how the contours and topography can ingrain themselves in an mind that is architect’s experiences, events, and data can ingrain themselves when writing down by hand.

Only after this understanding is clearer, will it be better to return to the computer. In the exact middle of the 2000s, the designers at creative consultancy Landor installed Adobe Photoshop on their computers and started deploying it. General manager Antonio Marazza tells author David Sax:

Final Thoughts

J.K. Rowling used this piece of lined paper and blue pen to plot out how the fifth book when you look at the series, Harry Potter and also the Order associated with the Phoenix, would unfold. The absolute most fact that is obvious that it seems the same as a spreadsheet.

And yet, to say she could have done this on the spreadsheet would be a stretch. The magic isn’t in the layout, that will be only the start. It’s into the annotations, the circles, the cross outs, and marginalia. I recognize that you can find digital equivalents every single among these tactics — suggestions, comments, highlights, and changing cell colors, but they simply don’t have the same effect.

Rowling writes of her original 40 characters, “It is quite strange to look at the list in this notebook that is tiny, slightly water-stained by some forgotten mishap, and covered in light pencil scribblings…while I happened to be writing these names, and refining them, and sorting them into houses, I had no clue where they were planning to go (or where they certainly were planning to take me).”

Goldberg writes in her book, that writing is a act that is physical. Perhaps creativity is a physical, analog, act, because creativity is a byproduct of being human, and humans are physical, analog, entities. And yet inside our work that is creative of convention, habit, or fear, we restrict ourselves to, as a person would describe to author Tara Brach, “live from the neck up.”